Settlement vs. Trial: When Your Lawyer’s Advice Might Be Biased
Share This Article
Your attorney just recommended accepting a settlement offer, but something feels wrong. Maybe the amount seems low, or you believe your case is stronger than your lawyer suggests. While most attorneys provide ethical guidance, financial pressures and business considerations can sometimes influence their recommendations in ways that don’t align with your best interests.
Understanding factors that might bias your lawyer’s advice can help you make informed decisions about settling or going to trial.
The Hidden Economics of Legal Representation
Attorneys face business pressures that can impact case recommendations. In contingency fee cases, lawyers receive a percentage of settlements or judgments but must cover litigation costs upfront. Quick settlements mean immediate payment with minimal expenses, while trials require months of unpaid work and substantial investment.
Important: Your attorney’s financial situation shouldn’t determine your case strategy. Ethical lawyers separate their business needs from client interests, but understanding these pressures helps you evaluate advice more critically.
Some attorneys handle high volumes of cases and rely on quick settlements to maintain cash flow. For these lawyers, lengthy trial preparation can strain their practice financially, creating incentives to settle cases that might be worth more at trial.
Law firm overhead costs, upcoming expenses, or seasonal cash flow patterns can also influence settlement recommendations. While these factors shouldn’t affect professional judgment, they sometimes do, especially in smaller practices or during economically challenging periods.
Recognizing Potential Bias in Settlement Advice
Pay attention to how your attorney presents settlement offers and trial alternatives. Lawyers inappropriately motivated to settle often emphasize trial risks while downplaying potential benefits. They might focus heavily on worst-case trial scenarios.
Warning signs include rushed decision-making pressure, reluctance to explain trial strategy in detail, or dismissive responses to questions about case value. Professional attorneys welcome client questions and provide thorough analysis of both settlement and trial options.
Be cautious if your attorney seems unwilling to invest in case development or expert witnesses that could strengthen your position. Attorneys should discuss these decisions with you rather than making them unilaterally based on their financial constraints.
Watch for inconsistencies between early case assessments and settlement recommendations. If your lawyer initially expressed confidence about your case but suddenly seems eager to settle at the first offer, ask for detailed explanations about what changed in the case evaluation.
Questions That Reveal True Case Value
Ask your attorney to break down the settlement offer compared to potential trial outcomes in specific dollar terms. Request information about similar cases they’ve handled, including both settlement amounts and trial results.
Inquire about case development costs and how they factor into settlement recommendations. Understanding whether financial constraints are limiting case preparation helps you make informed decisions.
Request a written analysis of your case’s strengths and weaknesses. This documentation helps ensure your attorney has thoroughly evaluated all aspects of your claim and provides a reference point for future discussions about strategy changes.
Ask about the timeline and costs associated with trial. Understanding the full picture helps you weigh your options effectively.

Your Rights in Settlement Decisions
You have the absolute right to reject any settlement offer, regardless of your attorney’s recommendation. No lawyer can accept a settlement without your explicit consent.
You’re entitled to detailed information about all settlement offers, including the reasoning behind proposals and how they compare to similar cases.
You have the right to seek a second opinion from another attorney about case value and settlement recommendations. While this might involve additional costs, it can provide valuable perspective.
Professional conduct rules require attorneys to communicate regularly about case developments and explain the advantages and disadvantages of different strategic options.
When to Question Your Lawyer’s Judgment
Be particularly skeptical if settlement pressure increases suddenly without corresponding changes in your case circumstances. Dramatic shifts in attorney recommendations often reflect business pressures rather than legal analysis.
Question advice that seems inconsistent with your attorney’s earlier assessments or with the evidence in your case.
Consider seeking independent evaluation if your attorney seems reluctant to discuss trial preparation or appears to lack knowledge about recent similar cases.
Getting Independent Perspective
The American Bar Association’s lawyer referral services can help you find qualified attorneys for second opinions about case value and strategy.
Consider consulting with attorneys who specialize in your type of case and don’t have business relationships with your current lawyer.
Document all communications about settlement offers and your attorney’s recommendations. This record can be valuable if you need to resolve disputes about case handling.
If you believe your attorney’s settlement advice reflects inappropriate bias, you can report deceptive practices to the Federal Trade Commission.
Making the Right Decision for Your Situation
Settlement versus trial decisions ultimately belong to you, not your attorney. While legal expertise is valuable, you know your financial needs, risk tolerance, and personal circumstances better than anyone else.
Consider factors beyond dollar amounts, including the time and stress of trial, the certainty of settlement versus unpredictable jury decisions, and your ability to withstand the demands of litigation.
Trust your instincts about whether your attorney’s advice aligns with your best interests. You have the right to expect recommendations that prioritize your goals rather than your lawyer’s business needs.

